Skip to Content

Infill Is Canada’s Real Housing Solution — And Banks Still Don’t Get It

Canada doesn’t have a housing problem.
January 23, 2026 by
Infill Is Canada’s Real Housing Solution — And Banks Still Don’t Get It
Admin

It has a land-use and financing problem.

While governments debate density targets and zoning reforms, the most practical housing solution is already sitting in our cities: infill development.

Small lots.

Existing neighbourhoods.

Underused land.

Gentle density.

Yet despite being one of the lowest-risk ways to add housing, infill remains chronically underfinanced by banks.

Why Infill Actually Works in Canada

Infill isn’t theory. It’s math.

Across Canada, infill projects:

  • Use existing infrastructure

  • Add housing where demand already exists

  • Avoid long approval timelines tied to greenfield sprawl

  • Support “missing middle” housing (duplexes, triplexes, laneway homes)

  • Preserve neighbourhood character while increasing supply

In cities like Toronto, Vancouver, and Montreal, infill is quietly doing what mega-developments can’t: delivering homes now, not a decade from now.

Why Banks Still Don’t Understand Infill

From a bank’s perspective, infill projects look messy.

They involve:

  • Small-scale builders

  • Non-standard plans

  • Changing zoning frameworks

  • Draw schedules

  • Transitional collateral (old house → new build)

Banks prefer repetition and scale.

Infill requires judgment and flexibility.

So even strong projects get stalled by:

  • Rigid underwriting

  • Slow approvals

  • Conservative draws

  • Zero tolerance for timeline changes

This disconnect is why infill builders often hear “no” — or worse, “yes, but not yet.”

Infill Isn’t Risky — It’s Misunderstood

Ironically, infill often carries less market risk than large developments.

Why?

  • Smaller unit counts

  • Faster build timelines

  • End buyers already live nearby

  • Proven resale demand

  • Lower exposure to market cycles

The risk isn’t the project.

The risk is capital uncertainty.

Why Private Infill Financing Works

Private lenders approach infill the way builders do — as a process.

They focus on:

  • As-completed value

  • Conservative loan-to-value ratios

  • Draw-based funding tied to progress

  • Builder experience

  • Clear exit strategies

Not just templates.

That makes private capital especially effective for:

  • Laneway and garden suites

  • Duplex and triplex conversions

  • Small lot redevelopments

  • Tear-down rebuilds

  • Phased intensification

Infill Is Where Housing Policy Meets Capital Reality

Governments can approve density all day.

Without funding that moves at the speed of construction, nothing gets built.

Infill succeeds when:

  • Capital is flexible

  • Draws are predictable

  • Timelines are respected

  • Exits are realistic

Private infill lending fills the gap between policy intent and shovels in the ground.

Why Builders Who Understand Infill Use Private Capital Early

Experienced infill builders don’t wait for banks to “catch up.”

They use private financing to:

  • Acquire land

  • Start construction immediately

  • Maintain momentum

  • De-risk timelines

  • Refinance or sell once stabilized

Private capital isn’t the backup plan — it’s often Phase One.

The Bottom Line

If Canada is serious about fixing its housing shortage, infill isn’t optional — it’s essential.

But infill requires lenders who understand:

  • Urban land

  • Small-scale development

  • Construction realities

Banks still don’t.

Private lenders do.

About Lendworth

Lendworth specializes in private infill and construction financing across Ontario, supporting builders and investors who are adding real housing — one lot, one project, one neighbourhood at a time.

Your equity deserves more™.

www.lendworth.ca